There was a sudden change in the votes announced in the 10th wave. The number of boxes counted was not given, Rezaee’s votes dipped and Mousavi’s votes suddenly increased at a higher rate.
There was a sudden change in the votes announced in the 10th wave. The number of boxes counted was not given, Rezaee’s votes dipped and Mousavi’s votes suddenly increased at a higher rate.
Rezaee’s votes suddenly dip in the 10th wave, probably to adjust the engineered votes with the actual votes. Karroubi’s votes also show an almost perfect line (r-sq= 0.9991).
Cenk Uygur, host of The Young Turks wrote this great piece on The Huffington Post:
“According to these “official” results Mousavi lost his own home district (which is inconceivable in Iranian politics) and got far less votes than previous reformist candidates. Look, these things are not even close to believable. No one should give these numbers a shred of credibility. What is only a hundred percent more likely is that the Iranian government decided ahead of time who was going to win and that was that.
And let’s be clear this isn’t a matter of some missing ballots or voting irregularities. This is simply making up a number and pretending it’s the real vote. I doubt they even counted the actual votes. What would be the point? Remember, the Iranian state news agency declared Ahmedinejad the winner before a single vote had been counted. Gee, I wonder who they were pulling for? I’ve never seen an election so rigged in my life (at least one that was actually pretending to be a real election). Saddam Hussein would be proud of the way this election was conducted.”
Thanks for the link, bellacrow!

A high r-squared (over 0.999) means that all the results are fake and are calculated based on a formula rather than votes from ballot boxes. In actual votes, it is not possible that all points for a candidate lie on a perfectly straight line. There is always scatter in actual voting (the points are some distance away from the fitted line).